Showing posts with label The legend of Korra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The legend of Korra. Show all posts

Sunday, 10 April 2016

Respectful disagreement #3: Why nostalgia isn't always good in TV and film

I'm sorry for not uploading any posts these past couple of weeks but have been busy with going home for a few days, studying, the cutthroat world of blogging and being a YouTuber and shrugging in unsurprised nonchalant apathy that Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) is being slammed as one of the most underachieving films of this year so far.  I will try to replicate this in the future and upload more frequently each weekend but I can't promise anything too solid.

Anyhoo, now that's out of the way, how about we talk about a big issue in film and TV that I was reminded by from a piece of recent pop-culture?  Hey, I know that wasn't as snappy as 'hey sluts, who wants to play strip Jenga!' but it'll just have to do methinks.  Now I know that nostalgia being a double-edged sword to video games and said culture has been thrown around since about 2010 or 2011 but it really isn't as big a problem as in TV and especially films.  For me, the worst three things about video games over the last half a decade has to have been over-involvement of marketers and producers in game design, repetition of formulas without improvement or experimentation and underhand business tactics such as day-one DLC, episodic games or DRM always-online settings.

The reason as to why I suddenly had THE TOTALLY ORIGINAL AND UNIQUE idea of writing an article about the cons of nostalgia on modern film and TV came about because of much reflection on the recent and awful Ghostbusters (2016) trailer that I did a written reaction to on this blog recently.  Upon more reflection on that travesty of a trailer I realised that it had copious amounts of nods to the original two films smothering the trailer and while designs of the ghostbusters uniforms and car were on point, the seemingly endless use of nostalgic imagery to build up hype and fan-base investment rubbed me up the wrong way.

Like I said though, TV and film even more so are both severely limited in their inventiveness and creativity as of late due to a huge over-reliance on nostalgia to sell views and tickets.  Fundamentally, this isn't a bad thing but it has to be done in moderation because while nostalgia can be a refreshing reminder of what was, it has to be used appropriately because if we just accept it as the narrative crux for a plot-point in a TV show or the basis of a films' narrative overall then we allow film and TV creators to use said nostalgia as a creative crux and be lazy with their writing and design.

TV, in all fairness, isn't too bad with this trend but it does happen from time to time with easily the most prevalent example being the WWE (Worldwide Wrestling Entertainment).  Now the WWE's main problem at the moment is easily its awful booking for big-event wrestling events but its overreliance on nostalgic booking of legendary wrestlers for ensuring the purchase of pay-per-view purchases and public event tickets isn't certainly helping.  This means that with the over-reliance on legends like Psycho Sid, Sting, The Undertaker and other legends of the industry for storyline-making which not only precipitates lazy writing that over-relies on the status of these legends who defined multiple decades of wrestling but can be very harmful to some of the older legends such as Shawn Michaels who injured his back a few years ago, The Undertaker who injured his shoulder in 2010 and most recently, Sting who injured himself last year in a match where he was 55 at the time.  Considering how physically-demanding wrestling is, not only does this mean that nostalgia can precipitate some lazy writing but can also risk the health of some truly tired and deserving-of-retirement wrestlers who just need a bit of rest.

Image source: http://wrestlingnews.co/wwe-teasing-the-undertaker-for-wrestlemania-32/

Image above: Legendary wrestler M.W.Calaway (aka The Undertaker) at the Wrestlemania 30 event in 2014.

In another TV example that is perhaps less visceral and is more of an example of fans wanting a nostalgically-friendly product so much so that it harms the new product being released; The Loony Tunes Show (2011-). Many people (not including myself) are very nostalgic towards the original cartoons as well as the multiple remakes made of the show in the 1990s and early-2000s but all to some degree or another used the same formulas just in different designs to suit different TV show demographics. 

Image source: https://www.blogger.com/blogin.g?blogspotURL=http://cartooncube.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/the-looney-tunes-show.html

When the 2011 series came along and changed up much of the physical-based comedy, character motivations and artistic themes and designs of the Looney Tunes universe, it didn't centre itself on the previously built cultivation of classic characters and instead tried mixing things up in terms of how story and character motivation were portrayed.  In turn, it was severely lambasted by a large portion of the Looney Tunes franchise fan-base and while I can certainly understand that change to something as long standing as this is tricky to get used to there are two things that made this aggravating.  Firstly was the fact that many of the fans were fans of the awful early-2000s remakes of the old show and completely disregarded any improvements made to the series in favour of rose-tinted images of the older shows.  Secondly was that the comedy was at least a lot more risqué than any seen throughout the 1980s-2000s era of the Looney Tunes and this was thrown to the dirt by many of the millennial fans who preferred the tired and now-stale of the Looney Tunes comedy that they had grown up with.  As a result, while picking up in the last couple of years, this superb remake/reboot of the legendary franchise was initially met with much hostility from old-school fans. 

Putting aside any misconceptions that people had about this show when it first came out and believe you me, I can certainly see where they come from and sympathise.  The Thing that people have to give credit to this 2011 series is that it tried to update a long-standing and flagging franchise to introduce it to a new generation of children and youngsters.  Regardless of what you may think about The Loony Tunes Show, it tried something new while keeping the core of what made the universe and franchise of the show so popular in the first place mostly intact while doing away with the less-popular dead weight.  The reason why I bring this up is that the show was buried under criticism from old school fans wishing to stick to older versions of the show from the 1990s and 2000s and unwilling to accept proper change to the franchise in order to give it a proper kick up the backside. 

The example with the WWE shows that an over-reliance on nostalgia can have adverse consequences for performers and actors on the part of the content creator while the same on behalf of the audience is shown by The Loony Tunes Show.  If we are to fully integrate what made older and well-established franchises to more modern TV and film styles and tropes for a modern audience in a smooth and constructive way then we have to reach a good balance between what the audience want and what seems to be the best way of either embracing or criticising modern culture. Now I'm not saying I have the be all and end all of solutions to this but as shown with the abundance of mini-series released after The Loony Tunes Show or the improvements made over the last few Wrestlemania events by WWE as shown by the success of Wrestlemania 32 in 2016, it seems like the best solution is simply trial and error and experimentation.  If anything, while this isn't a fully efficient method, it'll certainly produce the most clear results when trying to create a good implementation of nostalgia into modern entertainment.

Now if you want a bad example, particularly in film where this problem has been far worse over the last few years as compared to TV or even computer games then you need look no further than the 2015 film release Terminator: Genisys.

Image source: http://www.hdwallpapers.in/emilia_clarke_arnold_terminator_genisys-wallpapers.html

Now Genisys is certainly not the worst release in the Terminator series (1984-present) with the worst in my opinion being that god awful TV show The Sarah Connor Chronicles (2008-09) but Genisys was certainly not helped by its almost jaw-dropping over-reliance on nostalgic imagery throughout pretty much the entire film.  In all honesty, this wasn't the worst thing about the film or the main reason why it ended getting 26% on Rotten Tomatoes or 38% on Metacritic as that would probably be the shoddy writing and overly-backtracking story that beats the shit out of the overall franchise's storyline.  However, the film's narrative problems were certainly not helped by a stunning over-reliance on scenes ripped straight from the older films such as a shot-for-shot replication of the Nike trainers scene from the original 1984 film without any proper context or ripping the first murder scene by Arnold Schwarzenegger's T-800 in the first film almost entirely shot for shot and line for line or replicating the death of the main villain again to a scarily similar degree from the 2003 Terminator film Rise of the Machines.  The abundance of recreations of iconic scenes from older entries into the series was so over-saturated to such a degree that while I did enjoy this film overall, I never really got the sense that the film was trying to stand on its own two feet and instead tried to an almost wholesale degree to support itself on the iconography and pedigree of the Terminator series up to that point.  Did the film do better than the fourth film or the TV show?  Certainly, but it didn't revive the series to the degree that people thought it would on account of the almost unpalatable unoriginality rife throughout this movie.

Image source: http://lestoilesheroiques.fr/2015/03/terminator-genisys-arnold-schwarzenegger-et-emilia-clarke-en-couverture-dempire-nouvelles-images.html

Ok so to prevent myself from having my brains blasted out by a vengeful Emilia Clarke and her bloody dragon babies and terminator sidekick I should mention that this film is certainly not bad but it is certainly not the nostalgia and franchise tonic that was expected of it.  In a similar way to Wrestlemania 30 in 2014, the film was expected to supercharge its franchise to its former glory and much like in that case the over-reliance on the nostalgia of the creators became a crutch for the film meaning that it never felt like relying on its own worth as a stand-alone film regardless of the pedigree of the series that it is a part of.  Certainly not the main problem for the film but it is certainly a crippling one.

Now before I leave you all for another week I should mention the aforementioned point from me talking about The Loony Tunes Show that there really is no solid way of creating a bit of film, TV or a computer game that pays good homage to its series while updating the series to a good degree and creating a nice bit of medium that can stand solidly on its own two feet other than trial and error.  The WWE learned from the mistakes made between Wrestlemania 27 and 31 and used that to create one of the best Wrestlemania events in about a decade with number 32.  The Loony Tunes Show might not have been a wholesale success but it was a reasonably successful attempt at changing up the formula of its franchise while creating something new and anything that was learnt from its failings were then taken into account for future series.  Maybe some franchises like Terminator, Scooby Doo (1969-present) do use their nostalgia base as a crutch and this can be shown to be a financially viable option in some cases but with increasingly critical movie and consumer-going audiences being more and more the case along with the rise of social media this may be a thing of the past.  At the very least, as shown with TV shows like The Legend of Korra (2012-14) or films like Deadpool (2016), we are experiencing an increasing trend in using nostalgia as a dressing to fresh and updated ideas for established franchises and that makes me very hopeful for the future let me tell you that.

Hopefully I've hit the nail on the head for you all on this issue and if I haven't...then go suck on a copy of the original Scooby Doo boxset while cradling a Bugs Bunny cuddly toy...you fucking introvert.

Saturday, 26 March 2016

TV review #2: The Legend of Korra (2012-2014)



Image source: http://www.designntrend.com/articles/31700/20141219/legend-korra-finale-well-received-fans-dubbed-best-2014-forbes.htm

Well this could be seen as somewhat overdue couldn't it?  If I remember correctly, the last time I did a review of a TV show was way back in the prehistoric days of this blog when I reviewed the now defunct BBC3 show The Pranker (2011).  Of course you could tell from the title, picture and just going on google for 5 minutes that Nickelodeon's 2012-14 series The Legend of Korra is a tad different in a few regards.

Now there are a few things to get off my chest before we go into this review that may come back up later on so I'll just address them now:

1) I personally think this series is better than its predecessor Avatar: The last airbender (2005-08) but that does not meant that you should not see the original as it can help to understand some plot points but don't take this as meaning it is absolutely necessary to do so.

2) Season 2 is definitely the weakest one in this show but I personally thought it was okay.

3) The finale of the show at the end of season 4 I thought was great and the romance that it implied I thought was also great.

Right, so with that out of the way I'd say its high time to get into this don't you?

Image source: http://spinoff.comicbookresources.com/2015/03/31/eccc-voices-of-legend-of-korra-talk-acting-and-korrasami/

Set several decades after the finale of the 2005-08 original series, Korra takes up the story of the next avatar (a spiritual herald who can master all four of the core elements of fire, earth, water and wind) after the original series protagonist Aang passes on.  Whereas Aang was a bright-eyed young man from the wind-bending tribes with idealistic ideas of peace, this new avatar and new series protagonist Korra is a headstrong, aggressive and hard-nosed water-tribe girl with ideals of becoming the most powerful avatar of all time and surpassing her own personal limits.

Before I get further into the quality of the show I should of course mention that it is indeed an animated show borrowing both qualities from eastern Japanimation and western mainstream cartoons.  You probably could've told that from the pictures at this point but I should just say for the people out there not too partial to animated shows that this is still a great series worth considering.  I can understand the trepidation that some people have about animated shows but Korra is genuinely so well animated and told that I'd probably say go check it out anyway.  It'll hardly be a waste of your time if you do and at least then you can say you tried it out.

Off the bat, even from just looking at the protagonist motivations, you can tell that this sequel series is a certain degree more personal and intense on account of how the motivation for the main character this time round is something altogether more relatable than what was shown in the original show.  This isn't of course to say that anything that Aang did in the original series wasn't without motivation as his need and want to end the hundreds year war that was raging around him was more than understandable and sympathetic.  However, I found myself far more personally invested in Korra's drive to become more powerful and balanced in her role as the new avatar and the innate desire to become stronger and more powerful in all honesty was the main thing that drew me to her as a sympathetic and relatable character.  All in all, the motivations of the main and even side characters in the original series are great but I found myself drawn each episode without fail to Korra's drive to be the best person as well as avatar that she could be.

Image source: http://www.ew.com/article/2014/06/11/legend-of-korra-trailer-season-3

Korra herself is probably the main draw for myself to this series as not only is she a highly relatable young woman with understandable personal struggles and motivations but also marks herself out as a reasonably realistic representation of someone going through their late teens and early-20s.  Korra at multiple points throughout the series does things on a sporadic spur of the moment kind of motivation and sometimes this works while at others it explodes in her face.  This is how I remember trying to approach life in my late teens and found the failures that Korra incurred from this sympathetic but also a remarkably realistic way of building her character as she not only matures past her teens but also matures into the avatar she is destined to become.

Now as mentioned above, season 2 is the weakest out of the four seasons and the reason why I bring this up now at such an odd point in the review is that during this season, Korra's personal failings do become a bit frequent for my liking and a bit tiresome.  This is primarily because the first season was intended to be a one-off but when it exploded into being one of the most popular shows on TV in 2012, Nickelodeon (somewhat understandably) freaked the fuck out and pressured the companies that they made and produced The Legend of Korra with into greenlighting and producing at least another season.  Season 2 is by no means as bad as some others make it out to be but it certainly is the weakest overall as Korra seems to inexplicably return to an immature grouch.  By the end of season 2 this is averted through some good final-minute character development but the character development for the most of season 2 is really jumbled and quite clunky.  Thank goodness this never became that much of an issue again throughout the remaining 2 seasons after this but then again I don't think the animation studio or Nickelodeon were particularly well-prepared for or expecting of the success of the original series so I can understand the failings of the series in this regard.

So you might ask yourself then, is this the only major failing that the series has as a whole?  And I'd say probably yes as most if not all other faults I could find when both watching the series for the first time and again in retrospective didn't yield any major faults apart from this bit of character crumbling in the 2nd season.  The villain in season 2 is a bit rubbish, a few of the side characters are a bit irritating like president Raiko or the plague of my existence during season 3 which was Meelo.  However, aside from the character crapping in season 2 I really can't think of anything too major to criticise about the series.  The end to season 4 is the one other major thing I've heard people criticise considering its romantic implications about two characters who I won't mention here so as to not spoil the ending for you lot.  I personally thought this ending was great and the romantic implications with it were very tasteful, believable and I thought capped off a series with such dark undertones with a hear-warming ending.  Say what you will about the sexual politics implied within it and the rest of the series but I thought it was superb.

This in turn leads into something else I thought was great about the series in that the romantic relations between characters were some of the most realistic in any animated work I've ever seen.  The way romantic couples worked off of each other and how certain relationships ended showed a surprisingly realistic understanding of young and romantic relationships on the part of Nickelodeon and the other people who helped create this series.  Its certainly nice to see this continued on from and even improved in some places from Avatar: the last airbender.  This not only comes with some heart-warming romance throughout the series but some relationships become great focal points for the development of some characters. 

Therefore, the romance is not only well done but actually helps the series move along again much like in the original show.  Some might say that this takes away from the pulse-pounding action but I'd really say its worth it for the plot being moved along which in turn helps the action to become even more engaging.  Some might disagree but I personally found the romance in accordance with the character development and action to be the other main attractions of the series.  Considering how often romance is fucked up in other children's animated series I think this is a great thing and cannot be understated.  Even more so considering I'm not usually one for romance particularly in my action shows but I can certainly make the exception here and there.


Image source: http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/avatar-the-legend-of-korra/images/24369742/title/last-airbender-legend-korra-screencap


The other main positives I could then reasonably mention for the series aside from the action, relations between characters, romance and following on from the original series would be the respect that the series shows to ancient ideas of philosophy as well as multiple different eastern cultures.  Korra's own culture of the water tribe is heavily based off of the Inuit people of North America and Canada while the earth kingdom is based off of medieval China, the fire nation off of feudal Japan and the wind nation off of the Buddhist people of Tibet and Thailand.  The stark representations of these cultures and the values and philosophies they entail is truly remarkable for a TV show of this kind as I found the representations of said cultures to be both tasteful and truly fascinating. 

As someone who has actually travelled to China and Thailand I can say that the representations of eastern cultures and philosophies is among the best I've ever seen on TV let alone just in the sphere of cartoons.  Even if the action isn't your main draw into keep watching this show, I should wager that you'll be fascinated by the seamless integration of eastern Asian philosophy into both the story and character development.  Truly this is a beautifully written and presented as well as animated series.

However, if there is one other thing I can complement above the action, animation, philosophy and characters of the series, it is surely the villains of each season.

Image source: http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/avatar-the-legend-of-korra/images/24369739/title/last-airbender-legend-korra-screencap

Even with the aforementioned weak villain of the second season (no its not the villainous Amon above, he's the villain of the 1st season and is superb) the villains for the most part are highly intimidating evil bastards with understandable and even relatable motivations particularly my favourite villain Kuvira who terrorises the whole of the earth kingdom and our heroes in the 4th season.  The aforementioned villain above Amon is probably the most subversively interesting though as his whole struggle is to remove the powers of all element-bending people to create an equal world of same-powered peoples to thus create an ultimate image of equality throughout the world with his 'equalist' movement.  I felt like this was a highly fascinating and subtle representation of communist movements throughout Europe in the early 20th century.  This representation of famous historical events and ideological conflicts is something that resurfaces multiple times throughout the series with the villainous Kuvira's attempts in the 4th season to take over the earth kingdom being particularly reminiscent of the 1911 Chinese revolution and the civil war that came in its wake. 

As someone who has spent most of their life interested in and studying history I found these reflections and elusions to major historical events very fascinating.  They didn't come as much into the development of the characters as the inherent and subtle philosophy did but even still they were truly interesting.   And if you don't agree, then the aforementioned Kuvira will mess you up good and proper alright?

Image source: http://www.hypable.com/the-legend-of-korra-season-4-episode-3-recap/

In conclusion, would I recommend this series and who would I recommend it to?  In all honesty, I can only think of maybe two or three animated shows that I've ever enjoyed more than this show and I'd really recommend it to just about anyone.  Yes season 2 is a bit of a slog at times and there are one or two episodes in season 3 where I got a little bit bored and aside from a couple of side characters I was mildly irritated by I can't really think of anything to criticise this show on.  Were I to go further on complimenting its characters and story more than I have above I would be spoiling the show and were I to go further into my criticisms I would either be lying or just scraping the bottom of the barrel.  I really cant think of anything major at all to criticise and I can easily say that The Legend of Korra is not only one of my favourite cartoons of all time but is also one of my favourite TV shows period.  All this combined with the fusion of 1930s noire animation in allot of the episodes mixed in with the style and look of the original series creates for something truly special.  If you're either looking for action, romance, realistic character development or thrilling villains I'd recommend this show in all cases.

Image source: http://www.v-gamers.com/legend-of-korra-hinter-den-kulissen/

So of course I hope you all enjoy this show as much as if not more than I do and so I want you to have fun with whatever you're doing, take care, don't do anything I wouldn't do and until next time I'll see you all on the battlefield!

Animation & presentation: 10/10
Writing/story: 9/10
Characters/character development: 9/10
Action/set-pieces/key moments: 10/10
Design/style/artistry: 9/10
Series introduction: 8.5/10
Series conclusion: 10/10

Season 1: 10/10
Season 2: 7.5/10
Season 3: 8.75/10
Season 4: 10/10

Overall rating: Like a week-long holiday in Barcelona, you might feel a bit lethargic and not sure what you're doing sometimes but the experience of watching this show is something I would recommend without a moment's notice even considering its faults and downturns which even at their worst are really not that bad.